In this website we display the list of the ongoing genetic and leaf shape study of Chinese oak we sampled, please contact us for more information.
Species | Population | Individual | Genetic data | Leaf scanning | Photo |
Q. acrodonta | 1 | 15 | No | No | 0 |
Q. acutissima | 1 | 8 | No | No | 0 |
Q. aliena | 52 | 552 | 1 (24 pop), 7 (1 ind) | Yes | 433 |
Q. aquifolioides | 106 | 1400 | 4 (29 pop), 5 (58 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (18 pop), 9 (60 pop) | Yes | 353 |
Q. baronii | 5 | 32 | 7 (1 ind) | No | 15 |
Q. cocciferoides | 1 | 10 | No | No | 13 |
Q. dentata | 50 | 795 | 1 (31 pop) | Yes | 218 |
Q. dolicholepis | 3 | 21 | No | No | 26 |
Q. engleriana | 2 | 7 | 7 (1 ind) | No | 16 |
Q. fabri | 23 | 186 | 1 (18 pop), 7 (1 ind) | Yes | 146 |
Q. glauca | 1 | 3 | No | No | 0 |
Q. griffithii | 8 | 69 | 1 (8 pop), 7 (1 ind) | Yes | 15 |
Q. guyavaefolia | 7 | 54 | 2 (6 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (6 pop) | Yes | 45 |
Q. mongolica | 11 | 84 | 1 (4 pop), 7 (1 ind) | Yes | 55 |
Q. monimotricha | 9 | 77 | 2 (7 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (7 pop) | Yes | 283 |
Q. myrsinifolia | 1 | 2 | No | No | 0 |
Q. phillyraeoides | 4 | 25 | No | No | 11 |
Q. rehderiana | 10 | 59 | 2 (9 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (7 pop) | Yes | 56 |
Q. semecarpifolia | 13 | 155 | 2 (5 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (5 pop) | Yes | 42 |
Q. senescens | 8 | 58 | 2 (7 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (7 pop) | Yes | 95 |
Q. serrata | 40 | 268 | 1 (29 pop), 7 (2 ind) | Yes | 311 |
Q. spinosa | 60 | 802 | 4 (46 pop), 7 (1 ind), 8 (18 pop) | Yes | 804 |
Q. stewardii | 9 | 55 | 7 (1 ind) | No | 0 |
Q. tatakaensis | 1 | 1 | No | No | 0 |
Q. tungmaiensis | 1 | 4 | No | No | 17 |
Q. variabilis | 7 | 143 | 3 (5 pop), 6 (5 pop) | No | 0 |
Q. yunnanensisi | 4 | 28 | 1 (4 pop), 7 (1 ind) | Yes | 17 |
Note:
1: SSR 12 loci;
2: SSR 15 loci;
3: SSR 17 loci;
4: SSR 25 loci;
5: four cpDNA fragments (trnH-psbA, rpS16, trnS–trnT and trnQ–trnS);
6: five cpDNA fragments (accD-psaI-75R, rpS12- rpL20, trnH-psbA, rpS16, and trnQ–trnS);
7: chloroplast genome from 10× resequencing;
8: SNPs from 30× resequencing;
9: SNPs candidate gene of drought
The detail for the leaf image of each oak species see section Leaf Morphology.
Last update: November of 2023
Participants
We thank Dr. Bin Liu (Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Science, China); Dr. Yingchao Li (Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China); Prof. Jianquan Liu (Lanzhou University, China) for individual identification; graduate and undergraduate students from BFU for sampling, sorting and recording the sampling, they are: master student: Jia Song (2013-2016); Yuyao Wang (2015-2018); Yuan Liu (2015-2018); Yuejuan Li (2017-2020); Tianrui Wang (2017-2020); Wei Su (2018-2021); Yang Xu (2018-2021); Keke Liu (2019-2022); PhD candidate: Yanjun Luo (2022-) and PhD candidate: Min Qi (2021-).